You must be Logged in to post a comment

  • Submitted by mayorbee on Jun 27, 10 at 6:29pm

    I believe you have failed to account for the occasion of an infinitely long skirt paired with infinitely long boots. Your hypothesis would indicate that this would be an infinitely attractive woman. However, an infinitely long skirt would more likely indicate the presence of cankles.

    • 57 45
      Submitted by bmilk on Jun 27, 10 at 8:01pm

      No...this would approach 1, not 0. Approaching 0 means having a skirt length that approaches 0 and a boot length that approaches infinity.

      • 43 62
        Submitted by mayorbee on Jun 27, 10 at 8:31pm

        Unless the boot length is approaching infinty at a greater rate than skirt length. Comparing infinity to infinity when using physical measurements such as boot/skirt length would have an even more infinitesimal chance of being equal so as to be negligible.

        • 46 50
          Submitted by alias10 on Jun 27, 10 at 9:45pm

          L'hopital's rule bitch.

          • 33 39
            Submitted by mayorbee on Jun 27, 10 at 11:58pm

            Lengths of clothing are physical measurements, not functions. Therefore L'Hôpital wouldn't apply. Nice try, though.

            • 46 36
              Submitted by alias10 on Jun 28, 10 at 12:45am

              Le Chatelier's principle bitch.

            • 50 64
              Submitted by alias10 on Jun 28, 10 at 12:48am

              And how might a length of clothing approach infinity?

        • 50 44
          Submitted by bmilk on Jun 28, 10 at 10:00am

          Yeah but the boot length can't reach infinity, it has a limit (length of legs), so there is no way for it to be considerably greater than the skirt length unless the skirt length is very short.

  • Submitted by vodkaprince on Jun 27, 10 at 9:07pm

    Unfortunately, they do NOT give out Nobel Prizes for mathematical discoveries. This is because Nobel's wife had a lover, who was a mathematician, so Nobel took it out on all of them. True story.

  • Submitted by tangerineballs on Jun 27, 10 at 6:51pm

    At first glance I thought it read skirt to BOOB ratio...ie as skirt size approaches zero and boob size approaches infinity hotness increases exponentially

    • 42 46
      Submitted by alias10 on Jun 27, 10 at 9:47pm

      But the graph of boob size vs hotness is similar to the graph of water temperature vs density. With the 4 degrees Celsius mark being somewhere around DD's\n\ntl;dr: Huge ass boobs that sag to her feet are not hot.

  • Submitted by DeathsIntern on Jun 27, 10 at 10:49pm

    Wow. This post really brought out all the nerds...

  • 99 71
    Submitted by bathompson091 on Jun 27, 10 at 7:13pm

    Yes! Hell, if Obama got one then you should too.

  • 71 37
    Submitted by iwasbored on Jun 28, 10 at 3:06am

    To everyone who says this is wrong. Can't we all agree that if there is a ratio of 0:0 then there must be no skirt or boots. Implying that she is naked. And we all have to agree that if she's naked she is hot

  • 76 51
    Submitted by afatkid on Jun 27, 10 at 6:18pm

    Genius. Pure genius.

  • 70 47
    Submitted by kayby on Jun 27, 10 at 6:47pm

    Keith can you try a different Seinfeld quote??

  • 64 61
    Submitted by tangerineballs on Jun 27, 10 at 10:18pm

    Alfred Nobel NEVER married. However, he did have a mistress, a Viennese woman named Sophie Hess but there was never any proof she had an affair with a mathematician or anyone else for that matter.

  • 64 63
    Submitted by mooninacup on Jun 28, 10 at 12:32pm

    Unless those boots are uggs. In which case they could never be attractive.

  • 50 42
    Submitted by stiffy0118 on Jun 28, 10 at 7:04am

    No that is not a new discovery, that one has been around since empire records

  • 51 53
    Submitted by Mekavicus on Jun 28, 10 at 12:59pm

    What this poster doesn't know is that this mathematical relationship has already been discovered and documented: It is known as Zettai Ryouiki (Absolute Territory) and you can read about it here: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZettaiRyouiki

    • 40 41
      Submitted by malbeth on Jun 28, 10 at 7:48pm

      I come here to get *away* from tvtropes links. Why would you throw that at the innocent and unsuspecting??

  • 51 55
    Submitted by karebear624 on Jun 27, 10 at 6:59pm

    @mayorbee:genius. Pure genius.

  • 42 44
    Submitted by sandyballs on Jun 28, 10 at 3:32am

    Those pretzels are making Keith thirsty!

  • 52 65
    Submitted by callim105 on Jun 27, 10 at 7:48pm

    This vagina is making me thirsty!

  • 37 37
    Submitted by kcs99 on Jun 28, 10 at 1:46am

    @mayorbee, alias10,

  • 45 54
    Submitted by gNarbog on Jun 27, 10 at 11:19pm

    did everyone forget about white pants?

  • 56 77
    Submitted by kittyo9 on Jun 27, 10 at 8:03pm

    I'm not sure I understand this... if the hypothesis is stating that attractiveness increases as boot length and skirt length become more similar (as mayorbee implies), then the ratio should approach one, not zero (1:1 being the most similar). If the hypothesis is stating that attractiveness increases as boot length increases and skirt length decreases, then I understand, since the ratio would approach zero (0:infinity). Therefore to maximize attractiveness, wear the longest bo

    • 41 51
      Submitted by alias10 on Jun 27, 10 at 9:49pm

      He's saying that long boots + short skirt = attractive. that's why its approaching 0.

  • 38 44
    Submitted by ohyeahhh on Jun 29, 10 at 12:51pm

    Country Jammin'

  • 33 35
    Submitted by said8ED on Sep 20, 10 at 11:11pm

    Hahaha, you're not gettin' any!\n\nForget that Nobel thing, too.

  • 46 62
    Submitted by somethinsexy27 on Jun 28, 10 at 9:48am

    I think Iwasbored stated it perfectly...he's the one that deserves the Nobel prize

  • 40 51
    Submitted by Anonymous on Jun 28, 10 at 12:33am

    Attack of the nerds!?!?!? Hahahahhah biattttcchhhes

  • 51 74
    Submitted by bloo707 on Jun 27, 10 at 6:16pm

    That's brillance. Keith your ridiculous

  • 40 54
    Submitted by electricworry on Jun 28, 10 at 8:27pm

    Sorry bro. Japan already figured this out years ago, they have a name for it and everything.

  • 40 54
    Submitted by equestrian on Jun 27, 10 at 7:51pm

    Hmmm quite interesting. I will have to experiment.

  • 45 69
    Submitted by doubledurka on Jun 28, 10 at 3:12pm

    so according to your theory only the skirt to boot ratio relates to hotness... even if she were to have the ability to eat an apple through a chain link fence and have her fupa falling out of her skirt and on top of her boots... more than boot:skirt ratio needs to be accounted for

  • 19 18
    Submitted by kgirl1992 on Jul 4, 12 at 5:27pm

    Wasn't this on how I meet your mother?

  • 37 63
    Submitted by liljoker2124 on Jun 27, 10 at 7:29pm

    No one, no one at all

  • 48 88
    Submitted by unanimous on Jun 27, 10 at 6:24pm

    No he isn't.... Keith is my favorite! He is more entertaining than most of the texts!

  • 48 88
    Submitted by ssimkins89 on Jun 27, 10 at 6:18pm

    your either a nerd or too high. who compares math to women?

  • 42 78
    Submitted by g0jhawks on Jun 27, 10 at 7:28pm

    nine 1 three 2 six 9 eight 3 three 6\nAsk for Tyler

  • Submitted by ImKeithStone on Jun 27, 10 at 6:14pm

    These Pretzels are making me thirsty!

  • 7 16
    Submitted by actcohen on Oct 2, 12 at 10:39am

    Do those who walk about skirt-less and boot-less still count as attractive in this case?

  • 41 94
    Submitted by kold on Jun 27, 10 at 6:24pm

    First. ;D