Have some text gold?

Comments

You must be Logged in to post a comment

  • I believe you have failed to account for the occasion of an infinitely long skirt paired with infinitely long boots. Your hypothesis would indicate that this would be an infinitely attractive woman. However, an infinitely long skirt would more likely indicate the presence of cankles.

    Submitted by mayorbee on Jun 27, 10 at 6:29pm
    • No...this would approach 1, not 0. Approaching 0 means having a skirt length that approaches 0 and a boot length that approaches infinity.

      Submitted by bmilk on Jun 27, 10 at 8:01pm
      • Unless the boot length is approaching infinty at a greater rate than skirt length. Comparing infinity to infinity when using physical measurements such as boot/skirt length would have an even more infinitesimal chance of being equal so as to be negligible.

        Submitted by mayorbee on Jun 27, 10 at 8:31pm
        • L'hopital's rule bitch.

          Submitted by alias10 on Jun 27, 10 at 9:45pm
          • Lengths of clothing are physical measurements, not functions. Therefore L'Hôpital wouldn't apply. Nice try, though.

            Submitted by mayorbee on Jun 27, 10 at 11:58pm
        • Yeah but the boot length can't reach infinity, it has a limit (length of legs), so there is no way for it to be considerably greater than the skirt length unless the skirt length is very short.

          Submitted by bmilk on Jun 28, 10 at 10:00am
  • Unfortunately, they do NOT give out Nobel Prizes for mathematical discoveries. This is because Nobel's wife had a lover, who was a mathematician, so Nobel took it out on all of them. True story.

    Submitted by vodkaprince on Jun 27, 10 at 9:07pm
  • At first glance I thought it read skirt to BOOB ratio...ie as skirt size approaches zero and boob size approaches infinity hotness increases exponentially

    Submitted by tangerineballs on Jun 27, 10 at 6:51pm
    • But the graph of boob size vs hotness is similar to the graph of water temperature vs density. With the 4 degrees Celsius mark being somewhere around DD's\n\ntl;dr: Huge ass boobs that sag to her feet are not hot.

      Submitted by alias10 on Jun 27, 10 at 9:47pm
  • Wow. This post really brought out all the nerds...

    Submitted by DeathsIntern on Jun 27, 10 at 10:49pm
  • Yes! Hell, if Obama got one then you should too.

    Submitted by bathompson091 on Jun 27, 10 at 7:13pm
  • Genius. Pure genius.

    Submitted by afatkid on Jun 27, 10 at 6:18pm
  • To everyone who says this is wrong. Can't we all agree that if there is a ratio of 0:0 then there must be no skirt or boots. Implying that she is naked. And we all have to agree that if she's naked she is hot

    Submitted by iwasbored on Jun 28, 10 at 3:06am
  • Keith can you try a different Seinfeld quote??

    Submitted by kayby on Jun 27, 10 at 6:47pm
  • Unless those boots are uggs. In which case they could never be attractive.

    Submitted by mooninacup on Jun 28, 10 at 12:32pm
  • Alfred Nobel NEVER married. However, he did have a mistress, a Viennese woman named Sophie Hess but there was never any proof she had an affair with a mathematician or anyone else for that matter.

    Submitted by tangerineballs on Jun 27, 10 at 10:18pm
  • No that is not a new discovery, that one has been around since empire records

    Submitted by stiffy0118 on Jun 28, 10 at 7:04am
  • This vagina is making me thirsty!

    Submitted by callim105 on Jun 27, 10 at 7:48pm
  • What this poster doesn't know is that this mathematical relationship has already been discovered and documented: It is known as Zettai Ryouiki (Absolute Territory) and you can read about it here: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZettaiRyouiki

    Submitted by Mekavicus on Jun 28, 10 at 12:59pm
    • I come here to get *away* from tvtropes links. Why would you throw that at the innocent and unsuspecting??

      Submitted by malbeth on Jun 28, 10 at 7:48pm
  • Those pretzels are making Keith thirsty!

    Submitted by sandyballs on Jun 28, 10 at 3:32am
  • @mayorbee, alias10,

    Submitted by kcs99 on Jun 28, 10 at 1:46am
  • Attack of the nerds!?!?!? Hahahahhah biattttcchhhes

    Submitted by Anonymous on Jun 28, 10 at 12:33am
  • did everyone forget about white pants?

    Submitted by gNarbog on Jun 27, 10 at 11:19pm
  • Sorry bro. Japan already figured this out years ago, they have a name for it and everything.

    Submitted by electricworry on Jun 28, 10 at 8:27pm
  • @mayorbee:genius. Pure genius.

    Submitted by karebear624 on Jun 27, 10 at 6:59pm
  • Hahaha, you're not gettin' any!\n\nForget that Nobel thing, too.

    Submitted by said8ED on Sep 20, 10 at 11:11pm
  • I think Iwasbored stated it perfectly...he's the one that deserves the Nobel prize

    Submitted by somethinsexy27 on Jun 28, 10 at 9:48am
  • Wasn't this on how I meet your mother?

    Submitted by kgirl1992 on Jul 4, 12 at 5:27pm
  • Hmmm quite interesting. I will have to experiment.

    Submitted by equestrian on Jun 27, 10 at 7:51pm
  • That's brillance. Keith your ridiculous

    Submitted by bloo707 on Jun 27, 10 at 6:16pm
  • No he isn't.... Keith is my favorite! He is more entertaining than most of the texts!

    Submitted by unanimous on Jun 27, 10 at 6:24pm
  • I'm not sure I understand this... if the hypothesis is stating that attractiveness increases as boot length and skirt length become more similar (as mayorbee implies), then the ratio should approach one, not zero (1:1 being the most similar). If the hypothesis is stating that attractiveness increases as boot length increases and skirt length decreases, then I understand, since the ratio would approach zero (0:infinity). Therefore to maximize attractiveness, wear the longest bo

    Submitted by kittyo9 on Jun 27, 10 at 8:03pm
    • He's saying that long boots + short skirt = attractive. that's why its approaching 0.

      Submitted by alias10 on Jun 27, 10 at 9:49pm
  • Country Jammin'

    Submitted by ohyeahhh on Jun 29, 10 at 12:51pm
  • so according to your theory only the skirt to boot ratio relates to hotness... even if she were to have the ability to eat an apple through a chain link fence and have her fupa falling out of her skirt and on top of her boots... more than boot:skirt ratio needs to be accounted for

    Submitted by doubledurka on Jun 28, 10 at 3:12pm
  • your either a nerd or too high. who compares math to women?

    Submitted by ssimkins89 on Jun 27, 10 at 6:18pm
  • These Pretzels are making me thirsty!

    Submitted by ImKeithStone on Jun 27, 10 at 6:14pm
  • No one, no one at all

    Submitted by liljoker2124 on Jun 27, 10 at 7:29pm
  • Do those who walk about skirt-less and boot-less still count as attractive in this case?

    Submitted by actcohen on Oct 2, 12 at 10:39am
  • nine 1 three 2 six 9 eight 3 three 6\nAsk for Tyler

    Submitted by g0jhawks on Jun 27, 10 at 7:28pm
  • First. ;D

    Submitted by kold on Jun 27, 10 at 6:24pm