How fortunate humanity is that it need not rely on the female orgasm for procreation
You must be Logged in to post a comment
I fail to see how that's fortunate at all for the female half of humanity.
any biologist will tell you though, female orgasm raises the odds of conception substantially. That's why a woman who is cheating on her husband is something like 3 times more likely to get pregnant from her boyfriend than her husband, even with equal amounts of sex with both. It's because she is coming with the boyfriend and not with the husband. The overflow of fluids and hormones released make for a more hospitable environment for a mans sperm. All you sluts out there better wear a rubber while
that would be a great comment... if it were true orgasms have no effect on conception because regardless of whether she climaxes prostaglandins in the mans sperm will cause her uterus to contract and facilitate the sperms passage towards the fallopian tubes... if your going to quote bio...know your shit
so you admit contractions aid the passage of sperm through the vaginal canal, and orgasms obviously cause muscular contraction. so more contractions = more sperm able to make the journey. the person above is right, all they said is that it raises the odds. and I don't think you can "quote bio", sweetheart.
Three times is a ridiculous exaggeration. A few scientists have suggested that the female orgasm MIGHT slightly increase your likelihood of getting preggers. My human sexuality prof, however, has said that we have no real proof of this and people are just making crap up because we don't know what it actually does. Maybe it just makes sex fun? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm#Function_of_female_orgasm
Whatever happened to the Aahhh Classic guy??? I liked him.......
How unfortunate is it for the man who thinks the lack of female orgasm is fortunate.... because soon no one will sleep with him.
This coming from a guy who is unable to make a female orgasm...
This could well be from a woman who can't orgasm or whose boyfriends don't care about her pleasure.
Legonuts comments are annoying
( 61) Lol very true. Also fortunate for males that we'll still have sex without requiring it. Unlike them.
all the "good night" votes are from guys who don't think females should orgasm because they are "inferior"
While you all may be right in some way or another, the fact of the matter is this: if she's not getting off, you're not getting in.
Thankfully! So few men are that talented, that's why vibrators were invented. No men necessary. Male ejaculation doesn't always come with an orgasm either
Breeders think missionary is the only way.
Rule 66: If a guy can't get his girl to cum and she is willing to procreate with him, it's her fault for being too lazy to find a better man. So stop whining ladies
Girls don't hate, if you don't require your man to get better at sex, than be happy and pregnant and orgasmless.
I HATE YOU
I'd rather have it be that way. Too many stupid people on this world. It might help cut em down
I'm not satisfied until my girl cums like 3 times... It's like a game
Yeah, but bow much more fun is a female orgasm than none.
The amount of *back trolled* in the comment section is more entertaining than the actual text. 👍
Sounds like someone was left wet and open! Let me guess you'll passive aggresively post stuff on the internet anout it, yet still keep doing the guy.
Yeah but why do women even fake an orgasm? Because they think we care.
It's not really a coincidence, it's a product of evolution.
Rule 55: God knows all and therefore knew a problem with procreation would happen unless he let us humans reproduce without the female orgasm.
It's funny because of females had to get organs to make babies humans would all die
WOW.JUST.WOW. does your mommy know you have your helmet off again?
you....you are something special....