ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Comments

You must be Logged in to post a comment

  • Oh, who the hell cares? People are still gonna keep fucking like terminal cancer patients despite all the slut-shaming you morons do. Let it go already.

    Submitted by Vilexxica on Apr 25, 10 at 11:28am
  • Someone should tell this poor girl that it's only beneficial (in evolutionary terms) for men to have a "high number", so they can spread the seed. Women are supposedly just looking for one partner to impregnate her, and her goal is to lock that poor bastard in. \n\nSo I'm sorry honey, but even Darwin would still think you're a slut...

    Submitted by cdngirl on Apr 25, 10 at 8:00am
    • Women and men are both a little more complicated than that. Men want to have one main squeeze but lots of women on the side. Women want one man with a lot of money and then one man with a hot body to cheat on him with. Of course, this is just on the instinctual level and things just get more complicated from there.

      Submitted by Napster on Apr 25, 10 at 2:17pm
  • Actually humans are here to reproduce, as much as possible, which no longer applies to our life as we know it. Do you hope that after every sexual encounter, you are left pregnant? Probably the opposite. If anything, this is how fundie Christians begin their "sex is only for procreation, not fun" campaign.

    Submitted by heyoh on Apr 25, 10 at 10:40am
    • And thus created the abstinence only belief that and not promote safe sex. This site is full of plenty of proof that didn't work lol

      Submitted by Jagerman on Apr 26, 10 at 3:33am
  • "Be fruitful and become many" or something like that. I haven't read the bible since I found out Santa Claus and Spiderman wasn't real.

    Submitted by maskedman on Apr 25, 10 at 7:05am
    • Genesis 1:28 - God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth." It's a load of bunk.

      Submitted by Vilexxica on Apr 25, 10 at 11:30am
      • See also:\n\nPsalm 127:3-5 - Behold, children are a gift of the LORD, The fruit of the womb is a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior, So are the children of one's youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with their enemies in the gate." Also bunk...nothing more than breeder propaganda.

        Submitted by Vilexxica on Apr 25, 10 at 11:32am
  • false,shes right.in a biological sense the reason we are here is to reproduce, obviously females are included in that. The only thing is now that the human species has reached it's highest population in history we actually went past the maximum capacity that the earthcan hold.So by a scientific point.of view we have no more purpose here because we are only harming the earth now that we exceeded the amount she can supply for.just saying now bigg dealll

    Submitted by Anonymous on Apr 25, 10 at 9:14am
    • We haven't reached the maximum capacity. And you're wrong about the number of people that the Earth can support. There is MORE THAN ENOUGH food for everyone in the world two eat 2000 calories a day. The issue is that dictators find ways to cause famines. Move to the midwest you'll see there is plenty of land outside of the urban areas to produce food.

      Submitted by huskerfan9287 on Apr 26, 10 at 11:43am
  • Everyone is so busy worrying about what the message says; Did any one bother to take notice of the spelling mistake? "Sole" should be "soul". But because it said sole, I thought it was funny because I'm a biology nerd.

    Submitted by islandgirl209 on Apr 25, 10 at 4:11pm
    • "sole" means only. So this spelling is correct. Soul purpose would make no sense and as an english nerd I think you're stupid.

      Submitted by anonymous8906 on Apr 25, 10 at 10:20pm
      • It never ceases to amaze me how many people troll over stupid spelling errors on joke sites like this....get a life...ifya goin ta betch bout some impwoper inglish then u best b a teacher..lol

        Submitted by Jagerman on Apr 26, 10 at 3:30am
  • Cdngirl: Um no. Your statement is convuluted social mores not biological theory.

    Submitted by goldenrae9 on Apr 25, 10 at 8:58am
    • They might be social norms now, but it's based on evolutionary theory. The goal of humans, like any animals, is to reproduce as much as possible. For men, that means having sex with as many females as possible to ensure the greatest number of offspring since they can't carry their own. For women, once they become pregnant, they need the "stronger" "dominant" male around to protect and provide for them and the baby while she's in that "fragile" state.

      Submitted by cdngirl on Apr 25, 10 at 9:09am
  • judging by the comments posted this is probably the most intelligent in-depth conversation this site is going to see....so enjoy it everybody

    Submitted by sequioa on Apr 25, 10 at 8:47pm
  • I feel like the person who sent this goes to duquesne

    Submitted by natalie315 on Apr 27, 10 at 1:38am
  • Does oral or anal count? Bill Clinton

    Submitted by carleton1984 on Apr 25, 10 at 10:31pm
  • You're still mixing up social constructs with science. A post-pubescent female is capable of being pregnant more than once so even if she stayed with a mate for an entire pregnancy for protection that has no bearing on future reproduction

    Submitted by goldenrae9 on Apr 25, 10 at 1:10pm
ADVERTISEMENT