You must be Logged in to post a comment

  • 77 62
    Submitted by hansolo22 on Jun 22, 11 at 2:34pm

    Libel is written. It would have to be slander in this case. But this sounds like a decent strategy if you can get them to ask instead of being the homo who goes around praising his buddys cock

    • 67 59
      Submitted by jonathan171 on Jun 22, 11 at 9:38pm

      I think hacker meant liable not libel, or at least I hope so. It wouldn't be slander because to be slander the statement would have to be damaging to his reputation. Damaging someone's reputation is the antithesis of being a wingman.

  • 67 64
    Submitted by hacker201 on Jun 22, 11 at 11:13am

    Sounds like you want your buddy to be libel for false advertising!