Comments

You must be Logged in to post a comment

  • Libel is written. It would have to be slander in this case. But this sounds like a decent strategy if you can get them to ask instead of being the homo who goes around praising his buddys cock

    Submitted by hansolo22 on Jun 22, 11 at 2:34pm
    • I think hacker meant liable not libel, or at least I hope so. It wouldn't be slander because to be slander the statement would have to be damaging to his reputation. Damaging someone's reputation is the antithesis of being a wingman.

      Submitted by jonathan171 on Jun 22, 11 at 9:38pm
  • Sounds like you want your buddy to be libel for false advertising!

    Submitted by hacker201 on Jun 22, 11 at 11:13am